Wednesday, 20 May 2026

The 1973–74 market crash

from conversation about lessons learned

The 1973–74 market crash remains one of the most sobering chapters in financial history because it shattered the “60/40” illusion. As you correctly noted, when inflation is the primary driver of a bear market, the traditional inverse correlation between stocks and bonds tends to break down. Both assets get “re-rated” lower simultaneously.

The 1973–74 Anatomy: A Multi-Front War

The S&P 500’s decline wasn’t just a valuation correction; it was a fundamental shift in the global economic order. Several factors converged that mirror some of today’s anxieties:

  • The Oil Embargo: Energy prices quadrupled, creating a massive supply-side shock.

  • Monetary Transition: The final collapse of the Bretton Woods system led to currency volatility.

  • Sticky Inflation: CPI peaked at 12.3% in late 1974, rendering fixed-income yields negative in real terms.


The Winners: “Crisis Alpha” Strategies

The strategies that thrived during this window—and during the subsequent “Lost Decade” for stocks—are often categorized today as Managed Futures or Global Macro.

1. Trend Following (CTA)

In 1973, systems that followed price trends didn’t care about “value.” As oil moved up and equities moved down, these systems captured the momentum in both directions. By going short on sagging indices and long on soaring commodities, they provided what we call Crisis Alpha.

2. Hard Assets and Commodities

With the dollar in flux and paper assets losing purchasing power, “stuff” became the ultimate hedge. Gold, which had recently been decoupled from the dollar, and industrial commodities served as the only reliable stores of value.

3. Currency Diversification

As the U.S. struggled with stagflation, holding non-dollar denominations allowed investors to sidestep the domestic erosion of wealth.


Modern Portfolio Construction: Are We Prepared?

If you look at a standard modern brokerage portfolio, these elements are often missing. Most retail and even institutional portfolios are “long-only,” meaning they rely entirely on asset prices going up to generate returns.

To replicate the resilience of the 1973 winners, a portfolio today might include:

StrategyModern ImplementationRole in PortfolioTrend FollowingManaged Futures ETFs/FundsProfit from sustained moves down (Shorts) or up.CommoditiesBroad Commodity Indices (DBA, GSG)Hedge against “cost-push” inflation and supply shocks.Real AssetsTIPS, Gold, InfrastructureMaintain purchasing power when currency devalues.

The Reality Check

The challenge today is path dependency. In 1973, the Fed eventually had to “break” the economy to kill inflation. Today, the Fed faces a similar dilemma: fight inflation at the risk of a hard landing, or ease to support the banking system and risk a second wave of price increases.

The strategies that worked then are the ultimate “insurance policies.” They are often boring or even drags on performance during bull markets, but in a 1973-style regime, they transition from “optional” to “essential.”

Given the parallels you see in energy risks and Fed indecision, are you looking to pivot toward more “convex” protections, or are you more concerned with the opportunity cost of exiting equities too early?

No comments:

Post a Comment