Sunday, 28 December 2025

Final Reflection for the Year: The Power of Stopping

 As this year winds down, I keep coming back to a simple, counterintuitive truth about trading:


**Sometimes the most important step forward is the decision to stop.**


Not to quit.

Not to withdraw from the craft.

But to intentionally step back long enough to reset the parts of ourselves that markets tend to erode over time.


After months of staring at screens, absorbing volatility, navigating streaks, and riding our own psychological tides, our internal edge inevitably fades. Frustration accumulates. Overconfidence sneaks in. Fatigue masquerades as discipline. Even when our system still works, *we’re no longer in the ideal state to run it*.


Stepping away interrupts that drift.


It clears emotional residue.

It dissolves the biases that build quietly in the background.

And it gives us the space to return with the thing traders need most but rarely protect: **a fresh mind**.


Stopping isn’t a break from trading — it’s part of trading.

It’s how we reset our clarity, recalibrate our judgment, and prepare to meet the next year with cleaner perception and renewed intention.


So as we close out this year:


**If you feel the pull to stop — honor it.

The pause may be exactly what positions you for your best trading yet.**


Here’s to stepping back, resetting, and starting the next chapter fresh.


Wednesday, 12 November 2025

When Markets Float

There's a peculiar sensation in markets right now—like watching a dancer suspended mid-leap, beautiful and gravity-defying, yet inevitably bound to return to earth.

We're witnessing U.S. equities hover at record highs while the traditional warning signs of September and October volatility never materialized. Everything appears tranquil on the surface. But beneath? The currents are restless.

The Contradictions We're Living With

Consider the crosswinds:

Hiring has downshifted. Both consumer and wholesale prices continue their upward march. Tariffs haven't fully landed yet. The Fed continues to hint at rate cuts, but inflation remains stubborn. Small businesses are struggling, and major corporations are quietly reducing staff.

And yet—investors keep buying as if the music will never stop.

I've seen this film before. You probably have too.

March 2000: The Nasdaq's Moment

Twenty-five years ago, the Nasdaq Composite touched 5,000—a euphoric doubling in just twelve months. The consensus? Unstoppable.

The reality? A mirage that evaporated over eighteen brutal months, erasing 70% of its value. It would take fifteen years for the index to reclaim that peak.

The lesson was expensive: hope makes a terrible investment strategy, and gravity always collects its due.

October 2007: The Slow-Motion Collapse

The Dow reached 14,165, a gleaming new record. Eighteen months later, it had surrendered more than half its value. Even with the Fed's aggressive intervention, the index bottomed near 6,600 by March 2009.

The recovery took four years.

The pattern is unmistakable: optimism compounds, valuations detach from fundamentals, and then something breaks. Sometimes it's catastrophic and specific—the subprime mortgage unraveling. Sometimes it's October 1987: a relatively quiet Tuesday that became Black Monday for no particular reason at all.

Today's Version: Same Script, Different Actors

The Dow now sits above 45,000. The index composition has evolved—more technology, more concentration, different DNA than in 2000 or 2007.

The investor landscape has transformed, too. Mobile trading apps, meme stock mania, and AI-generated noise masquerading as signal. The mechanics have changed, but the emotional architecture remains identical: greed, anxiety, and the gnawing fear of being left behind.

Short memories. Stubborn optimism. History, stubbornly repeating.

I'm not opposed to rising markets. I'm concerned when they rise for the wrong reasons, stretch too far, persist too long, all while accountability takes an extended vacation.

The Illusion of Suspended Consequence

Watch a professional dancer execute a grand jeté. There's that breathtaking instant where physics seems negotiable, where they appear to float. We admire the artistry. But we know the truth: they're going to land.

Markets are no different.

Currently, prices are rising on the assumption that someone—the Federal Reserve, the government, perhaps divine intervention—will be there to catch them.

But has risk actually vanished? Or have we just stopped looking at it?

The Discipline That Cuts Through Narrative

Trend-following systems don't care about optimism. They ignore headlines, earnings calls, and gut feelings. They respond to the one signal that can't be spun: price action.

At The Trend Rider, we don't attempt to predict tops or call bottoms. We follow the trend and remain in motion. When the trend is up, we participate. When it breaks, we step aside. No emotion. No ego. Just systematic discipline.

This approach is purpose-built for precisely this environment—when data is murky, confidence is soaring alongside valuations, and consequences feel abstract and distant.

Until they don't.

The market doesn't need to crash tomorrow for systematic risk management to prove its worth. What matters is being ready when the music stops.

Because it always does.

Four Anchors in Turbulent Waters

History doesn't repeat, but it rhymes relentlessly. Every bubble wears a different costume, but the psychology underneath is identical. Investors convince themselves, "This time is different." It rarely is.

Markets recover, but not on your schedule. Yes, the Nasdaq came back. So did the Dow. But it took years—years that feel very different when you're living through them, especially if your portfolio is funding your life.

Price is truth serum. Narratives are easily manipulated. Trends reveal what's actually happening. A systematic approach that responds to price helps investors avoid the trap of wishful thinking disguised as conviction.

Risk management isn't marketing speak. It's the difference between the prepared and the regretful. It's what transforms chaos into opportunity rather than catastrophe.

The Parachute You Pack When the Sky Is Blue

I'm not predicting a crash. In fact, our systematic models currently maintain overweight positions in the very assets that would suffer most in a sharp correction. We're participating in this market.

But we're participating with our eyes open.

The signs of strain are visible. The historical precedents are clear. Now is not the moment to abandon risk management in favor of betting on a soft landing without a parachute.

Our systematic investing approach provides a natural buffer against the most unpredictable events—the parachute that deploys automatically, regardless of our feelings, our optimism, or our wishful thinking.

Because in markets, as in that suspended moment mid-leap, what goes up doesn't stay up forever.

The question isn't whether you'll land.

It's whether you're ready when you do.



With silver metal a clear leader again, Silvercorp is Canada-based company and it's actually China's largest primary silver producer.


 

Thursday, 30 October 2025

What do you think? "By 2035, the four pillars of Abundance—food, energy, education, and health—will be democratized through autonomous systems and AI. What used to be charity work becomes an AI-enabled protocol."

 I find this vision both compelling and worth deeply examining. 

The optimistic case is true: We're already seeing parts of it—AI tutors personalizing education at scale, diagnostic AI reaching underserved areas, precision agriculture optimizing yields, and renewable energy costs dropping. The convergence of AI with robotics, biotech, and distributed systems could truly make basics much more accessible. However, I am skeptical of the framing in several ways: "Democratized" might hide new dependencies. If these systems are controlled by a few tech companies or require vast computational infrastructure, we've simply shifted control over survival. The protocol might be more efficient than charity, but "decentralized abundance" could conceal centralized power. Human needs are not only material. Food, energy, education, and health delivered through optimized protocols might meet biological needs but miss relational, cultural, and meaning-making aspects. A perfectly personalized AI education isn't the same as learning within a community. Healthcare isn't just about diagnosis and treatment—it's also about being seen and heard. The transition period could be difficult. Even if the 2035 endpoint seems utopian, the journey there involves significant job displacement, power struggles over control of these systems, and the possible weaponization of scarcity during the transition. "What used to be charity" suggests that need will disappear. But new forms of scarcity often arise—attention, status, agency, purpose. And if basic needs are met by protocol, what becomes of human motivation and social cohesion?